USCG man sentenced for pollution cover -up
A FORMER engineer on the US Coast Guard cutter Rush has been fined US5,00, ordered to serve 200 hours of community service and serve two years of probation for lying to federal criminal investigators about his knowledge of the direct overboard discharge of bilge wastes through the ship’s deep sink into the Honolulu Harbor.
According to a Department of Justice statement as the main propulsion assistant David Williams oversaw the maintenance of the main diesel engines and other machinery in the engine room for the Rush, a 378 ft. high-endurance cutter stationed in Honolulu. On 1 May Mr Williams pleaded guilty to making a false statement to federal law enforcement agents.
According to the plea agreement, on or about 8 March 2006, Williams had knowledge of the direct discharge of bilge wastes into Honolulu Harbor. The Engineering Department personnel aboard the Rush engaged in an unusual and abnormal operation and configuration of engine room equipment to pump bilge wastes from the aft bilge to the deep sink and overboard into Honolulu Harbor, thereby bypassing the “oily water separator” (OWS) system.
The Department of Justice says that , in mid-March 2006, the State of Hawaii Department of Health received an anonymous complaint stating that Rush crew members were ordered to pump approximately 2,000 gallons of bilge waste into Honolulu Harbor. The statement says: “On May 1, 2006, investigators from the U.S. Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) received confirmation from Main Propulsion Division personnel who personally participated that bilge wastes had indeed been discharged through the deep sink and into Honolulu Harbor. CGIS investigators obtained various corroborative documents from the Rush, including engineering and ship’s logs, tank level sounding sheets, as well as the pneumatic pump used to facilitate the discharges.”
The Department of Justice statement makes no mention of any action being taken against the other US Coast Guard personnel involved in the illegal discharge nor of any action the the Coast Guard should take to prevent repetition of the offence.